linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip v3 1/2] kcov: Make runtime functions noinstr-compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:36:35 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 1/2] kcov: Make runtime functions
 noinstr-compatible

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 05:55:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 05:19:59PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> 
> > > Does GCC (8, as per the new KASAN thing) have that
> > > __builtin_memcpy_inline() ?
> > 
> > No, sadly it doesn't. Only Clang 11. :-/
> > 
> > But using a call to __memcpy() somehow breaks with Clang+KCSAN. Yet,
> > it's not the memcpy that BUGs, but once again check_preemption_disabled
> > (which is noinstr!). Just adding calls anywhere here seems to results in
> > unpredictable behaviour. Are we running out of stack space?
> 
> Very likely, bad_iret is running on that entry_stack you found, and as
> you found, it is puny.
> 
> Andy wanted to make it a full page a while ago, so I suppose the
> question is do we do that now?

Andy suggested doing the full page; untested patches here:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git x86/entry