[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq18sgml9ds.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 22:35:18 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc: Chris Boot <bootc@...tc.net>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: target/sbp: remove firewire SBP target driver
Finn,
> I haven't used this driver for a long time, but I still own PowerMacs
> with firewire, and I know I'm not the only one.
I also have old 1394 hardware kicking around in the basement. But having
worked with FireWire shared storage targets in the past, I have zero
desire to ever touch any of that again.
I could understand an objection if we were to entertain removing
sbp2. But really, how many people are setting up FireWire targets?
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists