lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:30:31 +0200
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>,
        Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] video: ssd1307fb: Print PWM period using 64-bit
 format specifier

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 09:18:34AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:17 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> > The PWM core will soon change the duty cycle and period of PWMs to 64
> > bits to allow for a broader range of values. Use a 64-bit format
> > specifier to avoid a warning when that change is made.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> 
> > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> > @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int ssd1307fb_init(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
> >                 /* Enable the PWM */
> >                 pwm_enable(par->pwm);
> >
> > -               dev_dbg(&par->client->dev, "Using PWM%d with a %dns period.\n",
> > +               dev_dbg(&par->client->dev, "Using PWM%d with a %lluns period.\n",
> >                         par->pwm->pwm, pwm_get_period(par->pwm));
> >         }
> 
> This change must be done together with changing the return type of
> pwm_get_period(), else you will get a compiler warning, and will print a
> bogus value.

Right, or we must change to passing (unsigned long
long)pwm_get_period(par->pwm), then change the prototype and then drop
the cast again.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ