[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200617174249.GL8681@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:42:49 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, bcrl@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-aio@...ck.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, selvakuma.s1@...sung.com,
nj.shetty@...sung.com, javier.gonz@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] zone-append support in aio and io-uring
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:53:36PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> This patchset enables issuing zone-append using aio and io-uring direct-io interface.
>
> For aio, this introduces opcode IOCB_CMD_ZONE_APPEND. Application uses start LBA
> of the zone to issue append. On completion 'res2' field is used to return
> zone-relative offset.
Maybe it's obvious to everyone working with zoned drives on a daily
basis, but please explain in the commit message why you need to return
the zone-relative offset to the application.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists