linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200618071955.GE6560@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:19:55 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@...il.com>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Markus Wamser <Markus.Wamser@...ed-mode.de>,
        "open list:ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
        "tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" <tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Luke Hinds <lhinds@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:12:41PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 04:44, Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 07:02:37PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > + Luke
> > >
> > > Hi Jarkko,
> > >
> > > Prior to addressing your comments below which seems to show your
> > > preference for compile time selection of trust source (TPM or TEE), I
> > > would just like to hear the reasons for this preference especially if
> > > it makes distro vendor's life difficult [1] to make opinionated
> > > selection which could rather be achieved dynamically based on platform
> > > capability.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/3/405
> > >
> > > -Sumit
> >
> > Hmm... I do get the distribution kernel point. OK, lets revert to
> > dynamic then. Thanks for the remark.
> >
> > /Jarkko
> 
> Thanks, will revert to dynamic mode in v6.

Sorry about the extra trouble caused by me.

/Jarkko