[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200618095429.tj3ddquy5m2q367e@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 15:24:29 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@....com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, lukasz.luba@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: arm_scmi: Set fast_switch_possible
conditionally
On 17-06-20, 10:43, Nicola Mazzucato wrote:
> Currently the fast_switch_possible flag is set unconditionally
> to true. Based on this, schedutil does not create a
> thread for frequency switching and would always use the
> fast switch path.
> However, if the platform does not support frequency
> fast switch, this may cause the governor to attempt an
> operation that is not supported by the platform.
>
> Fix this by correctly retrieve the fast_switch capability
> from the driver which knows if the platform can support
> this feature.
>
> Suggested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@....com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
> index 61623e2ff149..1cf688fcb56b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = latency;
>
> - policy->fast_switch_possible = true;
> + policy->fast_switch_possible =
> + handle->perf_ops->fast_switch_possible(handle, cpu_dev);
>
> em_register_perf_domain(policy->cpus, nr_opp, &em_cb);
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists