linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH glibc 1/3] glibc: Perform rseq registration at C startup and thread creation (v20)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:22:14 +0100
From:   Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>
To:     Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>
Cc:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Paul <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH glibc 1/3] glibc: Perform rseq registration at C startup
 and thread creation (v20)

The 06/11/2020 20:26, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > I managed to get a repository up and running for librseq, and have integrated
> > the rseq.2 man page with comments from Michael Kerrisk here:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/librseq/librseq.git/tree/doc/man/rseq.2
> > 
> > Is that a suitable URL ? Can we simply point to it from glibc's manual ?
> 
> Yes, that seems something reasonable to link to.

is there work to make the usage of rseq critical
sections portable? (e.g. transactional memory
critical section has syntax in gcc, but that
doesn't require straight line code with
begin/end/abort labels in a particular layout.)

the macros and inline asm in rseq-*.h are not
too nice, but if they can completely hide the
non-portable bits then i guess that works.