linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 388/388] bpf: Undo internal BPF_PROBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200618010805.600873-388-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 17 Jun 2020 21:08:05 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 388/388] bpf: Undo internal BPF_PROBE_MEM in BPF insns dump

From: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>

[ Upstream commit 29fcb05bbf1a7008900bb9bee347bdbfc7171036 ]

BPF_PROBE_MEM is kernel-internal implmementation details. When dumping BPF
instructions to user-space, it needs to be replaced back with BPF_MEM mode.

Fixes: 2a02759ef5f8 ("bpf: Add support for BTF pointers to interpreter")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200613002115.1632142-1-andriin@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 4e6dee19a668..5d1d24f56d53 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2923,6 +2923,7 @@ static struct bpf_insn *bpf_insn_prepare_dump(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	struct bpf_insn *insns;
 	u32 off, type;
 	u64 imm;
+	u8 code;
 	int i;
 
 	insns = kmemdup(prog->insnsi, bpf_prog_insn_size(prog),
@@ -2931,21 +2932,27 @@ static struct bpf_insn *bpf_insn_prepare_dump(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 		return insns;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
-		if (insns[i].code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL)) {
+		code = insns[i].code;
+
+		if (code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL)) {
 			insns[i].code = BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL;
 			insns[i].imm = BPF_FUNC_tail_call;
 			/* fall-through */
 		}
-		if (insns[i].code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL) ||
-		    insns[i].code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL_ARGS)) {
-			if (insns[i].code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL_ARGS))
+		if (code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL) ||
+		    code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL_ARGS)) {
+			if (code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL_ARGS))
 				insns[i].code = BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL;
 			if (!bpf_dump_raw_ok())
 				insns[i].imm = 0;
 			continue;
 		}
+		if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_LDX && BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) {
+			insns[i].code = BPF_LDX | BPF_SIZE(code) | BPF_MEM;
+			continue;
+		}
 
-		if (insns[i].code != (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW))
+		if (code != (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW))
 			continue;
 
 		imm = ((u64)insns[i + 1].imm << 32) | (u32)insns[i].imm;
-- 
2.25.1