lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <159248575341.21561.10817745653684251777.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:09:13 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] regulator: Constify some static struct variables

On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:32:42 +0200, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> Constify some static struct variables to allow the compiler to put them
> in read-only memory. There are more of these, but I figured I could
> start small. Also, is one patch per driver a good resolution or too
> fine-grained?
> 
> Rikard Falkeborn (5):
>   regulator: anatop: Constify anatop_core_rops
>   regulator: cpcap: Constify cpcap_regulator_ops
>   regulator: ltc3676: Constify ltc3676_regulators
>   regulator: max8907: Constify static structs
>   regulator: max8997: Constify struct regulator_ops
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/5] regulator: anatop: Constify anatop_core_rops
      commit: cae62a937912bd4b3faf8e268cc0ffcf00ec5850
[2/5] regulator: cpcap: Constify cpcap_regulator_ops
      commit: bcf39c1eb1e059ec612bf06f4aa7b3972dcc85e8
[3/5] regulator: ltc3676: Constify ltc3676_regulators
      commit: b37f076d4bfdd29b3aa497480b226759f659e25f
[4/5] regulator: max8907: Constify static structs
      commit: b08af72d6e5319e96527816c4b3b08d0b1a6f242
[5/5] regulator: max8997: Constify struct regulator_ops
      commit: 9ed84d24de480e81294e00814c142234bc17ce0c

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ