[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200618155820.GA3076467@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 17:58:20 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, rafael@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Manu Gautam <mgautam@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core:Export the symbol device_is_bound
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 08:45:55AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:14:43AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 12:09:52AM +0530, Sandeep Maheswaram wrote:
> > > Export the symbol device_is_bound so that it can be used by the modules.
> >
> > What modules need this?
>
> drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c (and probably other dwc3 'wrappers').
Why wasn't that said here? No context is not good :(
> Short summary: QCOM dwc3 support is split in two drivers, the core dwc3
> driver and the QCOM specific parts. dwc3-qcom is probed first (through
> a DT entry or ACPI), dwc3_qcom_probe() then calls of_platform_populate()
> to probe the core part. After a successful return from _populate() the
> driver assumes that the core device is fully initialized. However the
> latter is not correct, the driver core doesn't propagate errors from
> probe() to platform_populate(). The dwc3-qcom driver would use
> device_is_bound() to make sure the core device was probed successfully.
why does the dwc3-qcom driver care?
And why is the driver split in a way that requires such "broken"
structures? Why can't that be fixed instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists