lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:52:18 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Daniel Gutson <daniel@...ypsium.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>,
        Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ability to read the MKTME status from userspace

On 6/18/20 2:26 PM, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> Red Hat and Eclypsium are working on a specification to assess
> firmware platform security. One of the inputs that the specification
> takes into consideration is whether MKTME is enabled or disabled. 
> Exposing this value is necessary for tools checking the conformance
> of the specification.

What does TME's status on the platform tell you, though?

It doesn't tell you if your data is encrypted.  It doesn't even tell you
if your mlock()'d "in RAM" data is encrypted.

So, what good is it?

Are we going to need another one of these when the TME encryption
algorithm changes?  Do we need another driver when running in a SEV
guest to tell us about SEV's status?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ