linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xfs: Fix false positive lockdep warning with sb_internal & fs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:36:27 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xfs: Fix false positive lockdep warning with
 sb_internal & fs_reclaim

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:45:05AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:53:10PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_log.c   |  9 +++++++++
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> > index 00fda2e8e738..33244680d0d4 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> > @@ -830,8 +830,17 @@ xlog_unmount_write(
> >  	xfs_lsn_t		lsn;
> >  	uint			flags = XLOG_UNMOUNT_TRANS;
> >  	int			error;
> > +	unsigned long		pflags;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * xfs_log_reserve() allocates memory. This can lead to fs reclaim
> > +	 * which may conflicts with the unmount process. To avoid that,
> > +	 * disable fs reclaim for this allocation.
> > +	 */
> > +	current_set_flags_nested(&pflags, PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS);
> >  	error = xfs_log_reserve(mp, 600, 1, &tic, XFS_LOG, 0);
> > +	current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS);
> > +
> >  	if (error)
> >  		goto out_err;
> 
> The more I look at this, the more I think Darrick is right and I
> somewhat misinterpretted what he meant by "the top of the freeze
> path".
> 
> i.e. setting PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS here is out of place - only one caller
> of xlog_unmount_write requires PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS
> context. That context should be set in the caller that requires this
> context, and in this case it is xfs_fs_freeze(). This is top of the
> final freeze state processing (what I think Darrick meant), not the
> top of the freeze syscall call chain (what I thought he meant).

Aha!  Yes, that's exactly what I meant.  Sorry we all kinda muddled
around for a few days. :/

--D

> So if set PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS setting in xfs_fs_freeze(), it covers all
> the allocations in this problematic path, and it should obliviates
> the need for the first patch in the series altogether.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@...morbit.com