linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.7 002/376] drm/amdgpu: fix and cleanup amdgpu_gem_object

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200619141710.475464835@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:28:40 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.7 002/376] drm/amdgpu: fix and cleanup amdgpu_gem_object_close v4

From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>

[ Upstream commit 82c416b13cb7d22b96ec0888b296a48dff8a09eb ]

The problem is that we can't add the clear fence to the BO
when there is an exclusive fence on it since we can't
guarantee the the clear fence will complete after the
exclusive one.

To fix this refactor the function and also add the exclusive
fence as shared to the resv object.

v2: fix warning
v3: add excl fence as shared instead
v4: squash in fix for fence handling in amdgpu_gem_object_close

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Reviewed-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@....com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c | 43 ++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
index 4277125a79ee..32f36c940abb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
@@ -161,16 +161,17 @@ void amdgpu_gem_object_close(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
 
 	struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry vm_pd;
 	struct list_head list, duplicates;
+	struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
 	struct ttm_validate_buffer tv;
 	struct ww_acquire_ctx ticket;
 	struct amdgpu_bo_va *bo_va;
-	int r;
+	long r;
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&duplicates);
 
 	tv.bo = &bo->tbo;
-	tv.num_shared = 1;
+	tv.num_shared = 2;
 	list_add(&tv.head, &list);
 
 	amdgpu_vm_get_pd_bo(vm, &list, &vm_pd);
@@ -178,28 +179,34 @@ void amdgpu_gem_object_close(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
 	r = ttm_eu_reserve_buffers(&ticket, &list, false, &duplicates);
 	if (r) {
 		dev_err(adev->dev, "leaking bo va because "
-			"we fail to reserve bo (%d)\n", r);
+			"we fail to reserve bo (%ld)\n", r);
 		return;
 	}
 	bo_va = amdgpu_vm_bo_find(vm, bo);
-	if (bo_va && --bo_va->ref_count == 0) {
-		amdgpu_vm_bo_rmv(adev, bo_va);
-
-		if (amdgpu_vm_ready(vm)) {
-			struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
+	if (!bo_va || --bo_va->ref_count)
+		goto out_unlock;
 
-			r = amdgpu_vm_clear_freed(adev, vm, &fence);
-			if (unlikely(r)) {
-				dev_err(adev->dev, "failed to clear page "
-					"tables on GEM object close (%d)\n", r);
-			}
+	amdgpu_vm_bo_rmv(adev, bo_va);
+	if (!amdgpu_vm_ready(vm))
+		goto out_unlock;
 
-			if (fence) {
-				amdgpu_bo_fence(bo, fence, true);
-				dma_fence_put(fence);
-			}
-		}
+	fence = dma_resv_get_excl(bo->tbo.base.resv);
+	if (fence) {
+		amdgpu_bo_fence(bo, fence, true);
+		fence = NULL;
 	}
+
+	r = amdgpu_vm_clear_freed(adev, vm, &fence);
+	if (r || !fence)
+		goto out_unlock;
+
+	amdgpu_bo_fence(bo, fence, true);
+	dma_fence_put(fence);
+
+out_unlock:
+	if (unlikely(r < 0))
+		dev_err(adev->dev, "failed to clear page "
+			"tables on GEM object close (%ld)\n", r);
 	ttm_eu_backoff_reservation(&ticket, &list);
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1