linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] selftests/ftrace: Convert required interface checks into requires list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:26:10 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] selftests/ftrace: Convert required interface
 checks into requires list

On 6/17/20 8:58 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Shuah,
> 
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:48:12 -0600
> Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 6/11/20 6:03 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 6/10/20 7:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 06:04:33 -0600
>>>> Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Steve, what would you think?
>>>>>
>>>>> No worries. As far as kselftest tree is concrned, I can apply these
>>>>> after rc1 comes out with Tom's patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or I can give Ack and Steve can take these through tracing tree.
>>>>
>>>> All my patches have already made it to Linus's tree. Perhaps
>>>> cherry-pick the commit needed from Linus's tree (it shouldn't break
>>>> anything when Linus pulls it). Just let Linus know what you did, and
>>>> everything should be fine.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good to know. I will get these in.
>>>
>>
>> I applied all 7 patches to linux-kselftest next for my second update.
>> I saw a couple of merge problems with 4/7 patch even when I applied
>> it on top of with Tom's patch.
> 
> Oh, I might miss something.
> 
>>
>> I resolved them and amended the commit message to indicate the merge.
>> It is straight forward. Please check for sanity.
> 
> Yes, I confirmed that the merge looks good, and also test ran out
> without any error. :)
> 

Thanks for confirming. Pull request going out today.

thanks,
-- Shuah