[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200619141659.149717605@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:33:24 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 193/261] ima: Remove redundant policy rule set in add_rules()
From: Krzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com>
[ Upstream commit 6ee28442a465ab4c4be45e3b15015af24b1ba906 ]
Function ima_appraise_flag() returns the flag to be set in
temp_ima_appraise depending on the hook identifier passed as an argument.
It is not necessary to set the flag again for the POLICY_CHECK hook.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 99d357e84ee9..86624b1331ef 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -590,11 +590,8 @@ static void add_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *entries, int count,
list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules);
}
- if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE) {
+ if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE)
temp_ima_appraise |= ima_appraise_flag(entries[i].func);
- if (entries[i].func == POLICY_CHECK)
- temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY;
- }
}
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists