[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871rmbim8e.fsf@vostro.fn.ogness.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 08:49:21 +0200
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] printk: _printk_rb_static_dict can be static
On 2020-06-18, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> ---
> printk.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index 7642ef634956f..d812ada06735f 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static u32 log_buf_len = __LOG_BUF_LEN;
> */
> #define PRB_AVGBITS 5 /* 32 character average length */
>
> -_DECLARE_PRINTKRB(printk_rb_static, CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT - PRB_AVGBITS,
> +static _DECLARE_PRINTKRB(printk_rb_static, CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT - PRB_AVGBITS,
> PRB_AVGBITS, PRB_AVGBITS, &__log_buf[0]);
_DECLARE_PRINTKRB declares multiple variables, so this patch will not
work as intended. I would like to declare the variables static but am
not sure how best to go about it.
In the Linux source I see examples of macros just desclaring the
variables static. And I see examples of the macros providing a parameter
where the "static" keyword can be specified.
Since the ringbuffer was created exclusively to serve printk, I would
prefer to just have _DECLARE_PRINTKRB (and DECLARE_PRINTKRB) declare all
the variables as static.
John Ogness
Powered by blists - more mailing lists