[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD2FfiHVyt2hWBqcgtxbBaLEuxuzz6yAe1+8sK5J0SYWVEr5qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:47:42 +0100
From: Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Daniel Gutson <daniel@...ypsium.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ability to read the MKTME status from userspace
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 17:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Yes. I want to show the user *why* TME is not available.
> So even if it is "available" that's fine, even if it is not being used?
No, it's just one more thing we can check and report. For instance,
"Full memory encryption: NO [firmware-disabled, unencrypted-swap, EFI
memory map incomplete]
> And how can you ever tell if a BIOS disables a CPU feature, yet the chip
> still has it?
Isn't that what the "x86/tme: enabled by BIOS" kernel log entry is for?
Richard.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists