linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: mm/gup: Minor documentation update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <79febf94-8c04-dd41-90a7-19f4060fea38@nvidia.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:22:05 -0700
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>, <corbet@....net>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <jack@...e.cz>,
        <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: mm/gup: Minor documentation update

On 2020-06-17 12:27, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> Now there are 5 cases. Updated the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst b/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst
> index 6068266..7ca8c7b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ all combinations of get*(), pin*(), FOLL_LONGTERM, and more. Also, the
>   pin_user_pages*() APIs are clearly distinct from the get_user_pages*() APIs, so
>   that's a natural dividing line, and a good point to make separate wrapper calls.
>   In other words, use pin_user_pages*() for DMA-pinned pages, and
> -get_user_pages*() for other cases. There are four cases described later on in
> +get_user_pages*() for other cases. There are five cases described later on in


Probably better to just say "several" instead of "five", but either way is fine.

     Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA