linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v8 02/11] vhost: use batched get_vq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 20:07:57 +0200
From:   Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@...hat.com>
To:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v8 02/11] vhost: use batched get_vq_desc version

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:28 PM Eugenio Perez Martin
<eperezma@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 5:22 PM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 07:34:19AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > As testing shows no performance change, switch to that now.
> >
> > What kind of testing? 100GiB? Low latency?
> >
>
> Hi Konrad.
>
> I tested this version of the patch:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/13/42
>
> It was tested for throughput with DPDK's testpmd (as described in
> http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/howto/virtio_user_as_exceptional_path.html)
> and kernel pktgen. No latency tests were performed by me. Maybe it is
> interesting to perform a latency test or just a different set of tests
> over a recent version.
>
> Thanks!

I have repeated the tests with v9, and results are a little bit different:
* If I test opening it with testpmd, I see no change between versions
* If I forward packets between two vhost-net interfaces in the guest
using a linux bridge in the host:
  - netperf UDP_STREAM shows a performance increase of 1.8, almost
doubling performance. This gets lower as frame size increase.
  - rests of the test goes noticeably worse: UDP_RR goes from ~6347
transactions/sec to 5830
  - TCP_STREAM goes from ~10.7 gbps to ~7Gbps
  - TCP_RR from 6223.64 transactions/sec to 5739.44