lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200619211700.GS11244@42.do-not-panic.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 21:17:00 +0000
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] kernel: add a kernel_wait helper

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 04:46:27PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -1626,6 +1626,22 @@ long kernel_wait4(pid_t upid, int __user *stat_addr, int options,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +int kernel_wait(pid_t pid, int *stat)
> +{
> +	struct wait_opts wo = {
> +		.wo_type	= PIDTYPE_PID,
> +		.wo_pid		= find_get_pid(pid),
> +		.wo_flags	= WEXITED,
> +	};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = do_wait(&wo);
> +	if (ret > 0 && wo.wo_stat)
> +		*stat = wo.wo_stat;

Since all we care about is WEXITED, that could be simplified
to something like this:

if (ret > 0 && KWIFEXITED(wo.wo_stat)
 	*stat = KWEXITSTATUS(wo.wo_stat)

Otherwise callers have to use W*() wrappers.

> +	put_pid(wo.wo_pid);
> +	return ret;
> +}

Then we don't get *any* in-kernel code dealing with the W*() crap.
I just unwrapped this for the umh [0], given that otherwise we'd
have to use KW*() callers elsewhere. Doing it upshot one level
further would be even better.

[0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200610154923.27510-1-mcgrof@kernel.org              

  Luis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ