[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09bc7ef5-445f-b2df-aa55-a23710ecc481@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:12:16 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Xinlong Lin <linxl3@...gsu.com>,
Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@...anix.com>
Cc: "sean.j.christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
wanpengli <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
jmattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, joro <joro@...tes.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Felipe Franciosi <felipe@...anix.com>,
"rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix APIC page invalidation race
On 19/06/20 07:17, Xinlong Lin wrote:
>> Because of the above race, there can be a mismatch between the
>> host physical address stored in the APIC_ACCESS_PAGE VMCS field and
>> the host physical address stored in the EPT entry for the APIC GPA
>> (0xfee0000). When this happens, the processor will not trap APIC
>
> Is the APIC GPA shoud be 0xfee00000?
Yes, there's a missing zero.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists