linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] s390/zcore: traverse resources instead of memblocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200619144723.01fc99e8@laptop2-ibm.local>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:47:23 +0200
From:   Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Kirill Smelkov <kirr@...edi.com>,
        Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] s390/zcore: traverse resources instead of
 memblocks

Hi David,

zcore/memmap is no longer needed and Alexander is preparing a patch to remove
it. You can drop this patch.

Thanks
Philipp

On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:45:23 +0200
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 05:01:50PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > The zcore memmap basically contains the first level of all system RAM from
> > /proc/iomem. We want to disable CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK (e.g., to not
> > create memblocks for hotplugged/standby memory and save space), switch to
> > traversing system ram resources instead. During early boot, we create
> > resources for all early memblocks (including the crash kernel area). When
> > adding standby memory, we currently create both, memblocks and resources.
> > 
> > Note: As we don't have memory hotplug after boot (standby memory is added
> > via sclp during boot), we don't have to worry about races.
> > 
> > I am only able to test under KVM (where I hacked up zcore to still
> > create the memmap file)
> > 
> > root@vm0:~# cat /proc/iomem
> > 00000000-2fffffff : System RAM
> >   10424000-10ec6fff : Kernel code
> >   10ec7000-1139a0e3 : Kernel data
> >   1177a000-11850fff : Kernel bss
> > 30000000-3fffffff : Crash kernel
> > 
> > Result without this patch:
> > root@vm0:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/zcore/memmap
> > 0000000000000000 0000000040000000
> > 
> > Result with this patch:
> > root@vm0:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/zcore/memmap
> > 0000000000000000 0000000030000000 0000000030000000 0000000010000000
> > 
> > The difference is due to memblocks getting merged, resources (currently)
> > not. So we might have some more entries, but they describe the same
> > memory map.
> > 
> > Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> > Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> > Cc: Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@...edi.com>
> > Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/s390/char/zcore.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)  
> 
> I'm having a hard time to find any code that ever made use of this
> file. After all this was only meant for our zfcp dumper, but as far as
> I can tell there was never code out there that read the memmap file.
> 
> So the pragmatic approach would be to just change its contents, or a
> more progressive variant would be to remove the file completely.
> But maybe I'm entirely wrong...
> 
> I'm leaving this up to Philipp and Alexander :)