[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200619132101.GA304147@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:21:01 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Dajun Jin <adajunjin@...il.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] of: of_mdio: Correct loop scanning logic
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 09:47:58PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Commit 209c65b61d94 ("drivers/of/of_mdio.c:fix of_mdiobus_register()")
> introduced a break of the loop on the premise that a successful
> registration should exit the loop. The premise is correct but not to
> code, because rc && rc != -ENODEV is just a special error condition,
> that means we would exit the loop even with rc == -ENODEV which is
> absolutely not correct since this is the error code to indicate to the
> MDIO bus layer that scanning should continue.
>
> Fix this by explicitly checking for rc = 0 as the only valid condition
> to break out of the loop.
>
> Fixes: 209c65b61d94 ("drivers/of/of_mdio.c:fix of_mdiobus_register()")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/of_mdio.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_mdio.c b/drivers/of/of_mdio.c
> index a04afe79529c..7496dc64d6b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_mdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_mdio.c
> @@ -315,9 +315,10 @@ int of_mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *mdio, struct device_node *np)
>
> if (of_mdiobus_child_is_phy(child)) {
> rc = of_mdiobus_register_phy(mdio, child, addr);
> - if (rc && rc != -ENODEV)
> + if (!rc)
> + break;
Maybe add in a comment here about what ENODEV means in this context?
That might avoid it getting broken again in the future.
> + if (rc != -ENODEV)
> goto unregister;
> - break;
> }
> }
> }
> --
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists