lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1592575449-64278-8-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:03:55 -0700
From:   kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
To:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        yu-cheng.yu@...el.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de, gorcunov@...il.com,
        hpa@...or.com, alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, like.xu@...ux.intel.com,
        yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/21] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Use dynamic data structure for task_ctx

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>

The type of task_ctx is hardcoded as struct x86_perf_task_context,
which doesn't apply for Architecture LBR. For example, Architecture LBR
doesn't have the TOS MSR. The number of LBR entries is variable. A new
struct will be introduced for Architecture LBR. Perf has to determine
the type of task_ctx at run time.

The type of task_ctx pointer is changed to 'void *', which will be
determined at run time.

The generic LBR optimization can be shared between Architecture LBR and
model-specific LBR. Both need to access the structure for the generic
LBR optimization. A helper task_context_opt() is introduced to retrieve
the pointer of the structure at run time.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c  | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h |  7 +++++-
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index f220a4c..1c253ab 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -351,17 +351,17 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
 	wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_tos, tos);
 }
 
-static bool lbr_is_reset_in_cstate(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
+static bool lbr_is_reset_in_cstate(void *ctx)
 {
-	return !rdlbr_from(task_ctx->tos);
+	return !rdlbr_from(((struct x86_perf_task_context *)ctx)->tos);
 }
 
-static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
+static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 
-	if (task_ctx->opt.lbr_callstack_users == 0 ||
-	    task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state == LBR_NONE) {
+	if (task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_callstack_users == 0 ||
+	    task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state == LBR_NONE) {
 		intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
 		return;
 	}
@@ -371,16 +371,16 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
 	 * - No one else touched them, and
 	 * - Was not cleared in Cstate
 	 */
-	if ((task_ctx == cpuc->last_task_ctx) &&
-	    (task_ctx->opt.log_id == cpuc->last_log_id) &&
-	    !lbr_is_reset_in_cstate(task_ctx)) {
-		task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
+	if ((ctx == cpuc->last_task_ctx) &&
+	    (task_context_opt(ctx)->log_id == cpuc->last_log_id) &&
+	    !lbr_is_reset_in_cstate(ctx)) {
+		task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
 		return;
 	}
 
-	x86_pmu.lbr_restore(task_ctx);
+	x86_pmu.lbr_restore(ctx);
 
-	task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
+	task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
 }
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
@@ -406,27 +406,27 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
 	task_ctx->tos = tos;
 }
 
-static void __intel_pmu_lbr_save(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
+static void __intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 
-	if (task_ctx->opt.lbr_callstack_users == 0) {
-		task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
+	if (task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_callstack_users == 0) {
+		task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state = LBR_NONE;
 		return;
 	}
 
-	x86_pmu.lbr_save(task_ctx);
+	x86_pmu.lbr_save(ctx);
 
-	task_ctx->opt.lbr_stack_state = LBR_VALID;
+	task_context_opt(ctx)->lbr_stack_state = LBR_VALID;
 
-	cpuc->last_task_ctx = task_ctx;
-	cpuc->last_log_id = ++task_ctx->opt.log_id;
+	cpuc->last_task_ctx = ctx;
+	cpuc->last_log_id = ++task_context_opt(ctx)->log_id;
 }
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_swap_task_ctx(struct perf_event_context *prev,
 				 struct perf_event_context *next)
 {
-	struct x86_perf_task_context *prev_ctx_data, *next_ctx_data;
+	void *prev_ctx_data, *next_ctx_data;
 
 	swap(prev->task_ctx_data, next->task_ctx_data);
 
@@ -442,14 +442,14 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_swap_task_ctx(struct perf_event_context *prev,
 	if (!prev_ctx_data || !next_ctx_data)
 		return;
 
-	swap(prev_ctx_data->opt.lbr_callstack_users,
-	     next_ctx_data->opt.lbr_callstack_users);
+	swap(task_context_opt(prev_ctx_data)->lbr_callstack_users,
+	     task_context_opt(next_ctx_data)->lbr_callstack_users);
 }
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool sched_in)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
-	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx;
+	void *task_ctx;
 
 	if (!cpuc->lbr_users)
 		return;
@@ -486,17 +486,14 @@ static inline bool branch_user_callstack(unsigned br_sel)
 void intel_pmu_lbr_add(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
-	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx;
 
 	if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
 		return;
 
 	cpuc->br_sel = event->hw.branch_reg.reg;
 
-	if (branch_user_callstack(cpuc->br_sel) && event->ctx->task_ctx_data) {
-		task_ctx = event->ctx->task_ctx_data;
-		task_ctx->opt.lbr_callstack_users++;
-	}
+	if (branch_user_callstack(cpuc->br_sel) && event->ctx->task_ctx_data)
+		task_context_opt(event->ctx->task_ctx_data)->lbr_callstack_users++;
 
 	/*
 	 * Request pmu::sched_task() callback, which will fire inside the
@@ -527,16 +524,13 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_add(struct perf_event *event)
 void intel_pmu_lbr_del(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
-	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx;
 
 	if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
 		return;
 
 	if (branch_user_callstack(cpuc->br_sel) &&
-	    event->ctx->task_ctx_data) {
-		task_ctx = event->ctx->task_ctx_data;
-		task_ctx->opt.lbr_callstack_users--;
-	}
+	    event->ctx->task_ctx_data)
+		task_context_opt(event->ctx->task_ctx_data)->lbr_callstack_users--;
 
 	if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_baseline && event->attr.precise_ip > 0)
 		cpuc->lbr_pebs_users--;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index fd73c6c..e33d348 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
 	struct perf_branch_entry	lbr_entries[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES];
 	struct er_account		*lbr_sel;
 	u64				br_sel;
-	struct x86_perf_task_context	*last_task_ctx;
+	void				*last_task_ctx;
 	int				last_log_id;
 
 	/*
@@ -798,6 +798,11 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_ht_attr event_attr_##v = {		\
 struct pmu *x86_get_pmu(void);
 extern struct x86_pmu x86_pmu __read_mostly;
 
+static inline struct x86_perf_task_context_opt *task_context_opt(void *ctx)
+{
+	return &((struct x86_perf_task_context *)ctx)->opt;
+}
+
 static inline bool x86_pmu_has_lbr_callstack(void)
 {
 	return  x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map &&
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ