linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 086/267] perf: Add cond_resched() to task_function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200619141653.007511218@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:31:11 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+bb4935a5c09b5ff79940@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 086/267] perf: Add cond_resched() to task_function_call()

From: Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>

commit 2ed6edd33a214bca02bd2b45e3fc3038a059436b upstream.

Under rare circumstances, task_function_call() can repeatedly fail and
cause a soft lockup.

There is a slight race where the process is no longer running on the cpu
we targeted by the time remote_function() runs.  The code will simply
try again.  If we are very unlucky, this will continue to fail, until a
watchdog fires.  This can happen in a heavily loaded, multi-core virtual
machine.

Reported-by: syzbot+bb4935a5c09b5ff79940@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200414222920.121401-1-brho@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/events/core.c |   23 ++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -94,11 +94,11 @@ static void remote_function(void *data)
  * @info:	the function call argument
  *
  * Calls the function @func when the task is currently running. This might
- * be on the current CPU, which just calls the function directly
+ * be on the current CPU, which just calls the function directly.  This will
+ * retry due to any failures in smp_call_function_single(), such as if the
+ * task_cpu() goes offline concurrently.
  *
- * returns: @func return value, or
- *	    -ESRCH  - when the process isn't running
- *	    -EAGAIN - when the process moved away
+ * returns @func return value or -ESRCH when the process isn't running
  */
 static int
 task_function_call(struct task_struct *p, remote_function_f func, void *info)
@@ -111,11 +111,16 @@ task_function_call(struct task_struct *p
 	};
 	int ret;
 
-	do {
-		ret = smp_call_function_single(task_cpu(p), remote_function, &data, 1);
-		if (!ret)
-			ret = data.ret;
-	} while (ret == -EAGAIN);
+	for (;;) {
+		ret = smp_call_function_single(task_cpu(p), remote_function,
+					       &data, 1);
+		ret = !ret ? data.ret : -EAGAIN;
+
+		if (ret != -EAGAIN)
+			break;
+
+		cond_resched();
+	}
 
 	return ret;
 }