| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200620172804.3e28e257@archlinux>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 17:28:04 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com" <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: at91_adc: remove usage of iio_priv_to_dev() helper
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 08:02:55 +0000
"Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 15:42 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > [External]
> >
> > On Mon, 25 May 2020 13:25:13 +0300
> > Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
> >
> > > We may want to get rid of the iio_priv_to_dev() helper. The reason is
> > > that
> > > we will hide some of the members of the iio_dev structure (to prevent
> > > drivers from accessing them directly), and that will also mean hiding
> > > the
> > > implementation of the iio_priv_to_dev() helper inside the IIO core.
> > >
> > > Hiding the implementation of iio_priv_to_dev() implies that some fast-
> > > paths
> > > may not be fast anymore, so a general idea is to try to get rid of the
> > > iio_priv_to_dev() altogether.
> > > The iio_priv() helper won't be affected by the rework, as the iio_dev
> > > struct will keep a reference to the private information.
> > >
> > > For this driver, not using iio_priv_to_dev(), means reworking some
> > > paths to
> > > pass the iio device and using iio_priv() to access the private
> > > information.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
> > Looks good to me. Will leave it a bit longer though to potentially
> > get some people more familiar with the driver to sanity check it.
> >
> > Poke me after the usual couple of weeks if I seem to have lost it
> > down the back of the sofa.
> >
>
> ping on this
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
the autobuilders to play with it
Thanks,
J
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> > > index 0368b6dc6d60..896af58e88bc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> > > @@ -287,13 +287,13 @@ static void handle_adc_eoc_trigger(int irq,
> > > struct iio_dev *idev)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int at91_ts_sample(struct at91_adc_state *st)
> > > +static int at91_ts_sample(struct iio_dev *idev)
> > > {
> > > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > > unsigned int xscale, yscale, reg, z1, z2;
> > > unsigned int x, y, pres, xpos, ypos;
> > > unsigned int rxp = 1;
> > > unsigned int factor = 1000;
> > > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > >
> > > unsigned int xyz_mask_bits = st->res;
> > > unsigned int xyz_mask = (1 << xyz_mask_bits) - 1;
> > > @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_adc_9x5_interrupt(int irq,
> > > void *private)
> > >
> > > if (status & AT91_ADC_ISR_PENS) {
> > > /* validate data by pen contact */
> > > - at91_ts_sample(st);
> > > + at91_ts_sample(idev);
> > > } else {
> > > /* triggered by event that is no pen contact, just
> > > read
> > > * them to clean the interrupt and discard all.
> > > @@ -737,10 +737,10 @@ static int at91_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev
> > > *idev,
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int at91_adc_of_get_resolution(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> > > +static int at91_adc_of_get_resolution(struct iio_dev *idev,
> > > struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > {
> > > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > int count, i, ret = 0;
> > > char *res_name, *s;
> > > @@ -866,10 +866,10 @@ static int at91_adc_probe_dt_ts(struct
> > > device_node *node,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> > > +static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct iio_dev *idev,
> > > struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > {
> > > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > > struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > struct device_node *trig_node;
> > > int i = 0, ret;
> > > @@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct at91_adc_state
> > > *st,
> > > }
> > > st->vref_mv = prop;
> > >
> > > - ret = at91_adc_of_get_resolution(st, pdev);
> > > + ret = at91_adc_of_get_resolution(idev, pdev);
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto error_ret;
> > >
> > > @@ -1010,9 +1010,9 @@ static void atmel_ts_close(struct input_dev *dev)
> > > at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IDR, AT91RL_ADC_IER_PEN);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct at91_adc_state *st, u32 adc_clk_khz)
> > > +static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct iio_dev *idev, u32 adc_clk_khz)
> > > {
> > > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > > u32 reg = 0;
> > > u32 tssctim = 0;
> > > int i = 0;
> > > @@ -1085,11 +1085,11 @@ static int at91_ts_hw_init(struct
> > > at91_adc_state *st, u32 adc_clk_khz)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int at91_ts_register(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> > > +static int at91_ts_register(struct iio_dev *idev,
> > > struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > {
> > > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> > > struct input_dev *input;
> > > - struct iio_dev *idev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > input = input_allocate_device();
> > > @@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev)
> > > st = iio_priv(idev);
> > >
> > > if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> > > - ret = at91_adc_probe_dt(st, pdev);
> > > + ret = at91_adc_probe_dt(idev, pdev);
> > > else
> > > ret = at91_adc_probe_pdata(st, pdev);
> > >
> > > @@ -1301,11 +1301,11 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > goto error_disable_adc_clk;
> > > }
> > > } else {
> > > - ret = at91_ts_register(st, pdev);
> > > + ret = at91_ts_register(idev, pdev);
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto error_disable_adc_clk;
> > >
> > > - at91_ts_hw_init(st, adc_clk_khz);
> > > + at91_ts_hw_init(idev, adc_clk_khz);
> > > }
> > >
> > > ret = iio_device_register(idev);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists