lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200620184719.10994-1-longman@redhat.com>
Date:   Sat, 20 Jun 2020 14:47:19 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm, slab: Fix sign conversion problem in memcg_uncharge_slab()

It was found that running the LTP test on a PowerPC system could produce
erroneous values in /proc/meminfo, like:

  MemTotal:       531915072 kB
  MemFree:        507962176 kB
  MemAvailable:   1100020596352 kB

Using bisection, the problem is tracked down to commit 9c315e4d7d8c
("mm: memcg/slab: cache page number in memcg_(un)charge_slab()").

In memcg_uncharge_slab() with a "int order" argument:

  unsigned int nr_pages = 1 << order;
    :
  mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, cache_vmstat_idx(s), -nr_pages);

The mod_lruvec_state() function will eventually call the
__mod_zone_page_state() which accepts a long argument.  Depending on
the compiler and how inlining is done, "-nr_pages" may be treated as
a negative number or a very large positive number. Apparently, it was
treated as a large positive number in that PowerPC system leading to
incorrect stat counts. This problem hasn't been seen in x86-64 yet,
perhaps the gcc compiler there has some slight difference in behavior.

It is fixed by making nr_pages a signed value. For consistency, a
similar change is applied to memcg_charge_slab() as well.

Fixes: 9c315e4d7d8c ("mm: memcg/slab: cache page number in memcg_(un)charge_slab()").
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
 mm/slab.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
index 207c83ef6e06..74f7e09a7cfd 100644
--- a/mm/slab.h
+++ b/mm/slab.h
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static __always_inline int memcg_charge_slab(struct page *page,
 					     gfp_t gfp, int order,
 					     struct kmem_cache *s)
 {
-	unsigned int nr_pages = 1 << order;
+	int nr_pages = 1 << order;
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 	struct lruvec *lruvec;
 	int ret;
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static __always_inline int memcg_charge_slab(struct page *page,
 static __always_inline void memcg_uncharge_slab(struct page *page, int order,
 						struct kmem_cache *s)
 {
-	unsigned int nr_pages = 1 << order;
+	int nr_pages = 1 << order;
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 	struct lruvec *lruvec;
 
-- 
2.18.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ