[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgczNRMP-DK3Ga-e_HXvZMBbQNxthdGt=MqMZ0CFDHHcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 11:58:13 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] exec: Don't set group_exit_task during a coredump
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:36 AM Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
> Instead test SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP in signal_group_exit().
You say "instead", but the patch itself doesn't agree:
> static inline int signal_group_exit(const struct signal_struct *sig)
> {
> - return (sig->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT) ||
> + return (sig->flags & (SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT | SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP)) ||
> (sig->group_exit_task != NULL);
> }
it does it _in_addition_to_.
I think the whole test for "sig->group_exit_task != NULL" should be
removed for this commit to make sense.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists