linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm, slab: Fix sign conversion problem in memcg_uncharge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 20 Jun 2020 14:00:18 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, slab: Fix sign conversion problem in
 memcg_uncharge_slab()

On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 14:47:19 -0400 Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:

> It was found that running the LTP test on a PowerPC system could produce
> erroneous values in /proc/meminfo, like:
> 
>   MemTotal:       531915072 kB
>   MemFree:        507962176 kB
>   MemAvailable:   1100020596352 kB
> 
> Using bisection, the problem is tracked down to commit 9c315e4d7d8c
> ("mm: memcg/slab: cache page number in memcg_(un)charge_slab()").
> 
> In memcg_uncharge_slab() with a "int order" argument:
> 
>   unsigned int nr_pages = 1 << order;
>     :
>   mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, cache_vmstat_idx(s), -nr_pages);
> 
> The mod_lruvec_state() function will eventually call the
> __mod_zone_page_state() which accepts a long argument.  Depending on
> the compiler and how inlining is done, "-nr_pages" may be treated as
> a negative number or a very large positive number. Apparently, it was
> treated as a large positive number in that PowerPC system leading to
> incorrect stat counts. This problem hasn't been seen in x86-64 yet,
> perhaps the gcc compiler there has some slight difference in behavior.
> 
> It is fixed by making nr_pages a signed value. For consistency, a
> similar change is applied to memcg_charge_slab() as well.

This is somewhat disturbing.

> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static __always_inline int memcg_charge_slab(struct page *page,
>  					     gfp_t gfp, int order,
>  					     struct kmem_cache *s)
>  {
> -	unsigned int nr_pages = 1 << order;
> +	int nr_pages = 1 << order;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>  	struct lruvec *lruvec;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static __always_inline int memcg_charge_slab(struct page *page,
>  static __always_inline void memcg_uncharge_slab(struct page *page, int order,
>  						struct kmem_cache *s)
>  {
> -	unsigned int nr_pages = 1 << order;
> +	int nr_pages = 1 << order;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>  	struct lruvec *lruvec;
>  

I grabbed the patch, but Roman's "mm: memcg/slab: charge individual
slab objects instead of pages"
(http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200608230654.828134-10-guro@fb.com) deletes
both these functions.

It replaces the offending code with, afaict,


static inline void memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
					void *p)
{
	struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
	unsigned int off;

	if (!memcg_kmem_enabled() || is_root_cache(s))
		return;

	off = obj_to_index(s, page, p);
	objcg = page_obj_cgroups(page)[off];
	page_obj_cgroups(page)[off] = NULL;

	obj_cgroup_uncharge(objcg, obj_full_size(s));
	mod_objcg_state(objcg, page_pgdat(page), cache_vmstat_idx(s),
>>>			-obj_full_size(s));

	obj_cgroup_put(objcg);
}

-obj_full_size() returns size_t so I guess that's OK.



Also


static __always_inline void uncharge_slab_page(struct page *page, int order,
					       struct kmem_cache *s)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
	if (memcg_kmem_enabled() && !is_root_cache(s)) {
		memcg_free_page_obj_cgroups(page);
		percpu_ref_put_many(&s->memcg_params.refcnt, 1 << order);
	}
#endif
	mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), cache_vmstat_idx(s),
>>>			    -(PAGE_SIZE << order));
}

PAGE_SIZE is unsigned long so I guess that's OK as well.


Still, perhaps both could be improved.  Negating an unsigned scalar is
a pretty ugly thing to do.

Am I wrong in thinking that all those mod_foo() functions need careful
review?