linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] of: platform: Batch fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 19:32:51 -0700
From:   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ji Luo <ji.luo@....com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] of: platform: Batch fwnode parsing when adding all
 top level devices

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:07 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> I think instead of deferred_probe_work_func() moving the device to the
> end of the dpm_list, I think the device probing successfully is what
> should move it to the end of the dpm_list. That way, the dpm_list is
> actually ordered by when the devices become functional and not the
> random order in DT or random probe order which can get pretty
> convoluted with multiple deferred probes. This feels right and will
> make suspend/resume more robust against DT ordering -- but I'm not
> sure what other wide ranging impact this has for other platforms.

Geert,

If you want to play around with a potential fix to test my hypothesis,
I think it's just adding this one line to driver_bound():
============
klist_add_tail(&dev->p->knode_driver, &dev->driver->p->klist_devices);
device_links_driver_bound(dev);
+device_pm_move_to_tail(dev);

device_pm_check_callbacks(dev);
============

-Saravana