linux-kernel - [PATCH] irqchip/gic: Atomically update affinity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200621142537.784191-1-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:25:37 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/gic: Atomically update affinity

The GIC driver uses a RMW sequence to update the affinity, and
relies on the gic_lock_irqsave/gic_unlock_irqrestore sequences
to update it atomically.

But these sequences only expand into anything meaningful if
the BL_SWITCHER option is selected, which almost never happens.

It also turns out that using a RMW and locks is just as silly,
as the GIC distributor supports byte accesses for the GICD_TARGETRn
registers, which when used make the update atomic by definition.

Drop the terminally broken code and replace it by a byte write.

Fixes: 04c8b0f82c7d ("irqchip/gic: Make locking a BL_SWITCHER only feature")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 14 +++-----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index 00de05abd3c3..c17fabd6741e 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -329,10 +329,8 @@ static int gic_irq_set_vcpu_affinity(struct irq_data *d, void *vcpu)
 static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
 			    bool force)
 {
-	void __iomem *reg = gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_TARGET + (gic_irq(d) & ~3);
-	unsigned int cpu, shift = (gic_irq(d) % 4) * 8;
-	u32 val, mask, bit;
-	unsigned long flags;
+	void __iomem *reg = gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_TARGET + gic_irq(d);
+	unsigned int cpu;
 
 	if (!force)
 		cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
@@ -342,13 +340,7 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
 	if (cpu >= NR_GIC_CPU_IF || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	gic_lock_irqsave(flags);
-	mask = 0xff << shift;
-	bit = gic_cpu_map[cpu] << shift;
-	val = readl_relaxed(reg) & ~mask;
-	writel_relaxed(val | bit, reg);
-	gic_unlock_irqrestore(flags);
-
+	writeb_relaxed(gic_cpu_map[cpu], reg);
 	irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
 
 	return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
-- 
2.26.2