[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200621195052.GF9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:50:52 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu/tree: Force quiescent state on callback overload
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 12:07:27AM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> On callback overload, we want to force quiescent state immediately,
> for the first and second fqs. Enforce the same, by including
> RCU_GP_FLAG_OVLD flag, in fqsstart check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Good catch!
But what did you do to verify that this change does the right thing?
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index d0988a1..6226bfb 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ static void rcu_gp_fqs_loop(void)
> break;
> /* If time for quiescent-state forcing, do it. */
> if (!time_after(rcu_state.jiffies_force_qs, jiffies) ||
> - (gf & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS)) {
> + (gf & (RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS | RCU_GP_FLAG_OVLD))) {
> trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, rcu_state.gp_seq,
> TPS("fqsstart"));
> rcu_gp_fqs(first_gp_fqs);
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists