[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1592849223-17774-1-git-send-email-neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:37:03 +0530
From: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
To: paulmck@...nel.org, josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] rcu/tree: Remove CONFIG_PREMPT_RCU check in force_qs_rnp
Remove CONFIG_PREMPT_RCU check in force_qs_rnp(). Originally,
this check was required to skip executing fqs failsafe
for rcu-sched, which was added in commit a77da14ce9af ("rcu:
Yet another fix for preemption and CPU hotplug"). However,
this failsafe has been removed, since then. So, cleanup the
code to avoid any confusion around the need for boosting,
for !CONFIG_PREMPT_RCU.
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 6226bfb..57c904b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2514,8 +2514,7 @@ static void force_qs_rnp(int (*f)(struct rcu_data *rdp))
raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
rcu_state.cbovldnext |= !!rnp->cbovldmask;
if (rnp->qsmask == 0) {
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU) ||
- rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)) {
+ if (rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)) {
/*
* No point in scanning bits because they
* are all zero. But we might need to
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists