linux-kernel - Re: debugfs_create_u32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200622122332.274c842e@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:23:32 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Ronald Tschalär <ronald@...ovation.ch>,
        Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: debugfs_create_u32_array() memory leaks

On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 09:45:42 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 04:17:34PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I'm trying to use debugfs_create_u32_array() in drivers/net/netdevsim
> > and it causes memory leaks:
> > 
> > unreferenced object 0xffff8880546642a0 (size 16):
> >   comm "test_udp_tuns.s", pid 2146, jiffies 4294928368 (age 3772.435s)
> >   hex dump (first 16 bytes):
> >     84 52 6a 4d 80 88 ff ff 04 00 00 00 f3 78 7e 89  .RjM.........x~.
> >   backtrace:
> >     [<000000006962a447>] debugfs_create_u32_array+0x3f/0x90
> > 
> > I can see that debugfs_create_u32_array() allocates a structure at
> > create time that ends up assigned to inode->i_private, but I don't 
> > see it freed anywhere.
> > 
> > Am I missing something? I'm pretty sure files get removed, cause the
> > driver calls debugfs_remove_recursive() and no other file types leaks.  
> 
> Yeah, that's a bug, nice catch.  The debugfs_create*() functions should
> not allocate local memory as we can't know to free that memory when the
> file is removed.
> 
> Can you fix this up, or do you want me to?  I only see one in-kernel
> user of this, so it shouldn't be that tough to do so.  The one user
> never removes that file so that's why no one noticed this before.

Ah, I wasn't sure how to fix but since you say that create functions
shouldn't allocate memory seems like the fix will be to make callers
pass an equivalent of struct debugfs_blob_wrapper for u32.

I'm happy to send a patch to that effect - I have a process question
tho - I need this change in net-next, should I sent the patch to you?
Can it still make it into 5.8 (debugfs -> Linus -> net -> net-next) or
perhaps can it go via net-next since there is no de facto bug in 5.8?