[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKq8=3LaX0tWs0BfdpCYvKRRz5Cqv4cOXo1wcVvpY72cQA8RGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:50:08 +0800
From: Bo YU <tsu.yubo@...il.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/x86: Check return value from a notify_die() call
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 10:40 PM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
>
> I propose to improve the previous patch subject.
>
>
> > This is detected by Coverity scan: #CID: 1464472(CHECKED_RETURN)
> >
> > FIXES: c94082656dac7(x86: Use enum instead of literals for trap values)
>
> Is the following tag specification more appropriate?
>
> Fixes: c94082656dac7 ("x86: Use enum instead of literals for trap values")
Your description looks like more appropriate, thank you.
But I want to receive suggestions from other reviewers also. So I will
send V2 patch as your point
once got confirmed. Sorry.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists