[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200622071849.GF149351@builder.lan>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:18:49 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: ohad@...ery.com, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loic.pallardy@...com,
arnaud.pouliquen@...com, s-anna@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] remoteproc: Introducing function rproc_actuate()
On Mon 01 Jun 10:51 PDT 2020, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Introduce function rproc_actuate() that provides the same
> functionatlity as rproc_fw_boot(), but without the steps that
> involve interaction with the firmware image. That way we can
> deal with scenarios where the remoteproc core is attaching
> to a remote processor that has already been started by another
> entity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Regards,
Bjorn
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 0b323f6b554b..c70fa0372d07 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int __maybe_unused rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> +static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> int ret;
> @@ -1499,6 +1499,72 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
> + * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
> + */
> +static int __maybe_unused rproc_actuate(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Tell the PM runtime core we need to keep this device powered */
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * if enabling an IOMMU isn't relevant for this rproc, this is
> + * just a nop
> + */
> + ret = rproc_enable_iommu(rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "can't enable iommu: %d\n", ret);
> + goto put_pm_runtime;
> + }
> +
> + /* reset max_notifyid */
> + rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
> +
> + /* reset handled vdev */
> + rproc->nb_vdev = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Handle firmware resources required to attach to a remote processor.
> + * Because we are attaching rather than booting the remote processor,
> + * we expect the platform driver to properly set rproc->table_ptr.
> + */
> + ret = rproc_handle_resources(rproc, rproc_loading_handlers);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to process resources: %d\n", ret);
> + goto disable_iommu;
> + }
> +
> + /* Allocate carveout resources associated to rproc */
> + ret = rproc_alloc_registered_carveouts(rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate associated carveouts: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + goto clean_up_resources;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rproc_attach(rproc);
> + if (ret)
> + goto clean_up_resources;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +clean_up_resources:
> + rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
> +disable_iommu:
> + rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
> +put_pm_runtime:
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * take a firmware and boot it up.
> *
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists