[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200622072555.GI149351@builder.lan>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:25:55 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: ohad@...ery.com, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loic.pallardy@...com,
arnaud.pouliquen@...com, s-anna@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/9] remoteproc: Refactor function
rproc_trigger_auto_boot()
On Mon 01 Jun 10:51 PDT 2020, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Refactor function rproc_trigger_auto_boot() to properly deal
> with scenarios where the remoteproc core needs to attach with a
> remote processor that has already been booted by an external
> entity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Regards,
Bjorn
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 48ddc29814be..d32ac8f0c872 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1586,6 +1586,15 @@ static int rproc_trigger_auto_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> int ret;
>
> + /*
> + * Since the remote processor is in a detached state, it has already
> + * been booted by another entity. As such there is no point in waiting
> + * for a firmware image to be loaded, we can simply initiate the process
> + * of attaching to it immediately.
> + */
> + if (rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED)
> + return rproc_boot(rproc);
> +
> /*
> * We're initiating an asynchronous firmware loading, so we can
> * be built-in kernel code, without hanging the boot process.
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists