lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200622121024.000018e3@Huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:10:24 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To:     "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
CC:     "herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
        Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: permit users to specify numa node of acomp
 hardware

On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:24:23 +0100
"Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jonathan Cameron
> > Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 9:59 PM
> > To: Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
> > Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au; davem@...emloft.net; Seth Jennings
> > <sjenning@...hat.com>; Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-mm@...ck.org;
> > linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org; akpm@...ux-foundation.org; Dan Streetman
> > <ddstreet@...e.org>; Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: permit users to specify numa node of acomp
> > hardware
> > 
> > On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:48:59 +1200
> > Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > For a Linux server with NUMA, there are possibly multiple (de)compressors
> > > which are either local or remote to some NUMA node. Some drivers will
> > > automatically use the (de)compressor near the CPU calling acomp_alloc().
> > > However, it is not necessarily correct because users who send acomp_req
> > > could be from different NUMA node with the CPU which allocates acomp.
> > >
> > > Just like kernel has kmalloc() and kmalloc_node(), here crypto can have
> > > same support.
> > >
> > > Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>
> > > Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>
> > > Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.com>
> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>  
> > 
> > Hi Barry,
> > 
> > Seems sensible to me.  A few trivial comments inline.  
> 
> Thanks for your review, Jonathan.
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Jonathan
> >   
> > > ---
> > >  crypto/acompress.c         |  8 ++++++++
> > >  crypto/api.c               | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> > >  crypto/internal.h          | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> > >  include/crypto/acompress.h |  7 +++++++
> > >  include/linux/crypto.h     |  3 ++-
> > >  5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/crypto/acompress.c b/crypto/acompress.c
> > > index 84a76723e851..c32c72048a1c 100644
> > > --- a/crypto/acompress.c
> > > +++ b/crypto/acompress.c
> > > @@ -109,6 +109,14 @@ struct crypto_acomp *crypto_alloc_acomp(const  
> > char *alg_name, u32 type,  
> > >  }
> > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alloc_acomp);
> > >
> > > +struct crypto_acomp *crypto_alloc_acomp_node(const char *alg_name,  
> > u32 type,  
> > > +					u32 mask, int node)
> > > +{
> > > +	return crypto_alloc_tfm_node(alg_name, &crypto_acomp_type, type,  
> > mask,  
> > > +				node);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alloc_acomp_node);
> > > +
> > >  struct acomp_req *acomp_request_alloc(struct crypto_acomp *acomp)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct crypto_tfm *tfm = crypto_acomp_tfm(acomp);
> > > diff --git a/crypto/api.c b/crypto/api.c
> > > index edcf690800d4..4ecf712286af 100644
> > > --- a/crypto/api.c
> > > +++ b/crypto/api.c
> > > @@ -433,8 +433,9 @@ struct crypto_tfm *crypto_alloc_base(const char  
> > *alg_name, u32 type, u32 mask)  
> > >  }
> > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alloc_base);
> > >
> > > -void *crypto_create_tfm(struct crypto_alg *alg,
> > > -			const struct crypto_type *frontend)
> > > +void *crypto_create_tfm_node(struct crypto_alg *alg,
> > > +			const struct crypto_type *frontend,
> > > +			int node)
> > >  {
> > >  	char *mem;
> > >  	struct crypto_tfm *tfm = NULL;
> > > @@ -451,6 +452,7 @@ void *crypto_create_tfm(struct crypto_alg *alg,
> > >
> > >  	tfm = (struct crypto_tfm *)(mem + tfmsize);
> > >  	tfm->__crt_alg = alg;
> > > +	tfm->node = node;
> > >
> > >  	err = frontend->init_tfm(tfm);
> > >  	if (err)
> > > @@ -472,7 +474,7 @@ void *crypto_create_tfm(struct crypto_alg *alg,
> > >  out:
> > >  	return mem;
> > >  }
> > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_create_tfm);
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_create_tfm_node);
> > >
> > >  struct crypto_alg *crypto_find_alg(const char *alg_name,
> > >  				   const struct crypto_type *frontend,
> > > @@ -490,11 +492,13 @@ struct crypto_alg *crypto_find_alg(const char  
> > *alg_name,  
> > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_find_alg);
> > >
> > >  /*
> > > - *	crypto_alloc_tfm - Locate algorithm and allocate transform
> > > + *	crypto_alloc_tfm_node - Locate algorithm and allocate transform
> > >   *	@alg_name: Name of algorithm
> > >   *	@frontend: Frontend algorithm type
> > >   *	@type: Type of algorithm
> > >   *	@mask: Mask for type comparison
> > > + *	@node: NUMA node in which users desire to put requests, if node is
> > > + *		NUMA_NO_NODE, it means users have no special requirement.
> > >   *
> > >   *	crypto_alloc_tfm() will first attempt to locate an already loaded
> > >   *	algorithm.  If that fails and the kernel supports dynamically  
> > loadable  
> > > @@ -509,8 +513,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_find_alg);
> > >   *
> > >   *	In case of error the return value is an error pointer.
> > >   */
> > > -void *crypto_alloc_tfm(const char *alg_name,
> > > -		       const struct crypto_type *frontend, u32 type, u32 mask)
> > > +
> > > +void *crypto_alloc_tfm_node(const char *alg_name,
> > > +		       const struct crypto_type *frontend, u32 type, u32 mask,
> > > +		       int node)
> > >  {
> > >  	void *tfm;
> > >  	int err;
> > > @@ -524,7 +530,7 @@ void *crypto_alloc_tfm(const char *alg_name,
> > >  			goto err;
> > >  		}
> > >
> > > -		tfm = crypto_create_tfm(alg, frontend);
> > > +		tfm = crypto_create_tfm_node(alg, frontend, node);
> > >  		if (!IS_ERR(tfm))
> > >  			return tfm;
> > >
> > > @@ -542,7 +548,7 @@ void *crypto_alloc_tfm(const char *alg_name,
> > >
> > >  	return ERR_PTR(err);
> > >  }
> > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alloc_tfm);
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alloc_tfm_node);
> > >
> > >  /*
> > >   *	crypto_destroy_tfm - Free crypto transform
> > > diff --git a/crypto/internal.h b/crypto/internal.h
> > > index ff06a3bd1ca1..1b92a5a61852 100644
> > > --- a/crypto/internal.h
> > > +++ b/crypto/internal.h
> > > @@ -68,13 +68,28 @@ void crypto_remove_final(struct list_head *list);
> > >  void crypto_shoot_alg(struct crypto_alg *alg);
> > >  struct crypto_tfm *__crypto_alloc_tfm(struct crypto_alg *alg, u32 type,
> > >  				      u32 mask);
> > > -void *crypto_create_tfm(struct crypto_alg *alg,
> > > -			const struct crypto_type *frontend);
> > > +void *crypto_create_tfm_node(struct crypto_alg *alg,
> > > +			const struct crypto_type *frontend, int node);
> > > +
> > > +static inline void *crypto_create_tfm(struct crypto_alg *alg,
> > > +			const struct crypto_type *frontend)
> > > +{
> > > +	return crypto_create_tfm_node(alg, frontend, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  struct crypto_alg *crypto_find_alg(const char *alg_name,
> > >  				   const struct crypto_type *frontend,
> > >  				   u32 type, u32 mask);
> > > -void *crypto_alloc_tfm(const char *alg_name,
> > > -		       const struct crypto_type *frontend, u32 type, u32 mask);
> > > +
> > > +void *crypto_alloc_tfm_node(const char *alg_name,
> > > +		       const struct crypto_type *frontend, u32 type, u32 mask,
> > > +		       int node);
> > > +
> > > +static inline void *crypto_alloc_tfm(const char *alg_name,
> > > +		       const struct crypto_type *frontend, u32 type, u32 mask)
> > > +{
> > > +	return crypto_alloc_tfm_node(alg_name, frontend, type, mask,  
> > NUMA_NO_NODE);  
> > > +}
> > >
> > >  int crypto_probing_notify(unsigned long val, void *v);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/crypto/acompress.h b/include/crypto/acompress.h
> > > index 2b4d2b06ccbd..b1a78687014a 100644
> > > --- a/include/crypto/acompress.h
> > > +++ b/include/crypto/acompress.h
> > > @@ -106,6 +106,13 @@ struct acomp_alg {
> > >   */
> > >  struct crypto_acomp *crypto_alloc_acomp(const char *alg_name, u32  
> > type,  
> > >  					u32 mask);
> > > +/**
> > > + * crypto_alloc_acomp_node() -- allocate ACOMPRESS tfm handle with  
> > desired NUMA  
> > > + *				node  
> > 
> > Given slightly relaxed view on 80 chars now in place, I'd put that on one line.
> >   
> 
> Will put in another line.
> 
> > Also kernel-doc needs to be complete so though it's tedious you should
> > document
> > the other parameters.  
> 
> You mean here the doc for other parameters should be copied from crypto_alloc_acomp()? 
> If so, it is ok to me :-)

Yes.  Always worth sanity checking new kernel-doc by
running the script over the file and fixing any warnings you have introduced.

> 
> >   
> > > + * @node:	specifies the NUMA node the ZIP hardware belongs to
> > > + */
> > > +struct crypto_acomp *crypto_alloc_acomp_node(const char *alg_name,  
> > u32 type,  
> > > +					u32 mask, int node);
> > >
> > >  static inline struct crypto_tfm *crypto_acomp_tfm(struct crypto_acomp  
> > *tfm)  
> > >  {
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/crypto.h b/include/linux/crypto.h
> > > index 763863dbc079..c1a47ce4c09e 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/crypto.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/crypto.h
> > > @@ -593,8 +593,9 @@ int crypto_has_alg(const char *name, u32 type, u32  
> > mask);  
> > >   */
> > >
> > >  struct crypto_tfm {
> > > -  
> > 
> > Stray change. Shouldn't be in this patch.  
> 
> Will have a separate patch for this.

Is it really worth bothering?  I'd just leave a blank line there. Feels harmless!

> 
> > 
> >   
> > >  	u32 crt_flags;
> > > +
> > > +	int node;
> > >
> > >  	void (*exit)(struct crypto_tfm *tfm);
> > >  
> >   
> 
> Best Regard
> Barry
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ