[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200622113141.GC6516@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:31:42 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/signal.c: Export symbol __lock_task_sighand
On 06/22, Dominique Martinet wrote:
>
> What about the possibility of sighand being null that the function does
> check, is that impossible for current as well?
It is only possible if "current" has already exited and passed exit_notify(),
iow if it is already a zombie and can be (auto)reaped.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists