linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: single: support #pinctrl-cells = 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200622164628.GA510359@x1>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:46:28 +0200
From:   Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>,
        Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: single: support #pinctrl-cells = 2

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 09:11:32AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org> [200618 05:52]:
> > Currently, pinctrl-single only allows #pinctrl-cells = 1.
> > 
> > This series will allow pinctrl-single to also support #pinctrl-cells = 2
> > 
> > If "pinctrl-single,pins" has 3 arguments (offset, conf, mux) then
> > pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry() does an OR operation on to get the
> > value to store in the register.
> >     
> > To take advantage of #pinctrl-cells = 2, the AM33XX_PADCONF macro in
> > omap.h is modified to keep pin conf and pin mux values separate.
> 
> Hmm to me it looks like the order of the patches is the
> wrong way around here. Don't we need to first change
> pinctrl-single.c, and then only after that update the
> dts? And make sure the pinctrl-single.c change does not
> break anything without changing the dts :)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony

Thanks for pointing this out.

I'll submit new version where:
[PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: single: parse #pinctrl-cells = 2
[PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: change AM33XX_PADCONF macro separate conf and mux
[PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: am33xx-l4: change #pinctrl-cells from 1 to 2

-drew