linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "kernel/printk: add kmsg SEEK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200622173741.GA8956@glitch>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:37:41 -0300
From:   Bruno Meneguele <bmeneg@...hat.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "kernel/printk: add kmsg SEEK_CUR handling"

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:32:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:10 AM Bruno Meneguele <bmeneg@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Although both options are pretty fine by me too, I "fear" (not really)
> > we can end up stacking special behavior interfaces, forcing userspace to
> > keep a "table of special case files". Personally, I prefer to return
> > something _valid_ to userspace rather than _fail_ with special meaning.
> 
> Well, what's even worse if user space has to handle two different
> things just because behavior changed in different kernels..
> 
> So at some point "odd behavior" is much better than "odd behavior in
> two different ways"..

Really well pointed!

Ok, +1 for doc-only patch it is :).

-- 
bmeneg 
PGP Key: http://bmeneg.com/pubkey.txt

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)