[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200623134442.wj4i3r3dlp6rtpaq@gilmour.lan>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:44:42 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>,
Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: sun8i-ce - Fix runtime PM imbalance in
sun8i_ce_cipher_init
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 07:50:08PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Fix this by …
>
> Please replace the beginning of this sentence with the tag “Fixes”.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=625d3449788f85569096780592549d0340e9c0c7#n183
No, not really. The comment you (partially) quoted explains how the
issue is fixed, your suggestion explains what commit introduced the fix
in the first place. They are both beneficial, but there's strictly no
reason to remove the former for the latter.
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists