[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200623151738.GK4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:17:38 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the printk tree
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:28:58PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> PS: And yes, it makes sense to push both patches via a single tree to
> make sure that the lockdep.h split is done first.
That's what I got you tip/locking/header for, pull that topic branch
into your tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
