[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200623155918.GC23842@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:59:18 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>
Cc: Jon Cargille <jcargill@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86 mmu: avoid mmu_page_hash lookup for
direct_map-only VM
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:53:48PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> If we do get agressive and zap all children (or if my analysis is wrong),
> and prevent the mixed level insansity, then a simpler approach would be to
> skip the lookup if the MMU is direct. I.e. no need for the per-VM toggle.
> Direct vs. indirect MMUs are guaranteed to have different roles and so the
> direct MMU's pages can't be reused/shared.
Clarification on the above. Direct and not-guaranteed-to-be-direct MMUs for
a given VM are guaranteed to have different roles, even for nested NPT vs.
NPT, as nested MMUs will have role.guest_mode=1.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists