[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200623161010.GE32590@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:10:10 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
Mike Stunes <mstunes@...are.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Juergen Gross <JGross@...e.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Should SEV-ES #VC use IST? (Re: [PATCH] Allow RDTSC and RDTSCP
from userspace)
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:32:22PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> MSR_MCG_STATUS.MCIP, and yes - any #MC before that point will
> immediately Shutdown. Any #MC between that point and IRET will clobber
> its IST stack and end up sad.
Well, at some point we should simply accept that we're living a little
on the edge. That is, until we get IRET with a mask of to-reenable
vectors which has #MC, NMI and whatever else vectors. It would be even
better if that mask were configurable.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists