lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200623164733.qbhua7b6cg2umafj@macmini.local>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:47:33 +0200
From:   Willy Wolff <willy.mh.wolff.ml@...il.com>
To:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: brocken devfreq simple_ondemand for Odroid XU3/4?

Hi everybody,

Is DVFS for memory bus really working on Odroid XU3/4 board?
Using a simple microbenchmark that is doing only memory accesses, memory DVFS
seems to not working properly:

The microbenchmark is doing pointer chasing by following index in an array.
Indices in the array are set to follow a random pattern (cutting prefetcher),
and forcing RAM access.

git clone https://github.com/wwilly/benchmark.git \
  && cd benchmark \
  && source env.sh \
  && ./bench_build.sh \
  && bash source/scripts/test_dvfs_mem.sh

Python 3, cmake and sudo rights are required.

Results:
DVFS CPU with performance governor
mem_gov = simple_ondemand at 165000000 Hz in idle, should be bumped when the
benchmark is running.
- on the LITTLE cluster it takes 4.74308 s to run (683.004 c per memory access),
- on the big cluster it takes 4.76556 s to run (980.343 c per moemory access).

While forcing DVFS memory bus to use performance governor,
mem_gov = performance at 825000000 Hz in idle,
- on the LITTLE cluster it takes 1.1451 s to run (164.894 c per memory access),
- on the big cluster it takes 1.18448 s to run (243.664 c per memory access).

The kernel used is the last 5.7.5 stable with default exynos_defconfig.

Cheers,
Willy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ