[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200623005231.27712-10-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:52:27 -0700
From: paulmck@...nel.org
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: stern@...land.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@...il.com, will@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, boqun.feng@...il.com, npiggin@...il.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr,
akiyks@...il.com, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/14] tools/memory-model: Fix reference to litmus test in recipes.txt
From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
The name of litmus test doesn't match the one described below.
Fix the name of litmus test.
Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
index 7fe8d7a..63c4adf 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
+++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ However, it is not necessarily the case that accesses ordered by
locking will be seen as ordered by CPUs not holding that lock.
Consider this example:
- /* See Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus. */
+ /* See Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus. */
void CPU0(void)
{
spin_lock(&mylock);
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists