[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1592873653.28977.1.camel@mtkswgap22>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:54:13 +0800
From: Dennis-YC Hsieh <dennis-yc.hsieh@...iatek.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
Houlong Wei <houlong.wei@...iatek.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>,
HS Liao <hs.liao@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/11] soc: mediatek: cmdq: add write_s function
Hi Matthias,
On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 19:08 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 22/06/2020 18:12, Dennis-YC Hsieh wrote:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 17:54 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>
> >> On 22/06/2020 17:36, Dennis-YC Hsieh wrote:
> >>> Hi Matthias,
> >>>
> >>> thanks for your comment.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 13:07 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 21/06/2020 16:18, Dennis YC Hsieh wrote:
> >>>>> add write_s function in cmdq helper functions which
> >>>>> writes value contains in internal register to address
> >>>>> with large dma access support.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Dennis YC Hsieh <dennis-yc.hsieh@...iatek.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>> include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h | 1 +
> >>>>> include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c
> >>>>> index bf32e3b2ca6c..817a5a97dbe5 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c
> >>>>> @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ struct cmdq_instruction {
> >>>>> union {
> >>>>> u32 value;
> >>>>> u32 mask;
> >>>>> + struct {
> >>>>> + u16 arg_c;
> >>>>> + u16 src_reg;
> >>>>> + };
> >>>>> };
> >>>>> union {
> >>>>> u16 offset;
> >>>>> @@ -222,6 +226,21 @@ int cmdq_pkt_write_mask(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u8 subsys,
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_pkt_write_mask);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +int cmdq_pkt_write_s(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u16 high_addr_reg_idx,
> >>>>> + u16 addr_low, u16 src_reg_idx)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>
> >>>> Do I understand correctly that we use CMDQ_ADDR_HIGH(addr) and
> >>>> CMDQ_ADDR_LOW(addr) to calculate in the client high_addr_reg_idx and addr_low
> >>>> respectively?
> >>>>
> >>>> In that case I think a better interface would be to pass the address and do the
> >>>> high/low calculation in the cmdq_pkt_write_s
> >>>
> >>> Not exactly. The high_addr_reg_idx parameter is index of internal
> >>> register (which store address bit[47:16]), not result of
> >>> CMDQ_ADDR_HIGH(addr).
> >>>
> >>> The CMDQ_ADDR_HIGH macro use in patch 02/11 cmdq_pkt_assign() api. This
> >>> api helps assign address bit[47:16] into one of internal register by
> >>> index. And same index could be use in cmdq_pkt_write_s(). The gce
> >>> combine bit[47:16] in internal register and bit[15:0] in addr_low
> >>> parameter to final address. So it is better to keep interface in this
> >>> way.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Got it, but then why don't we call cmdq_pkt_assign() in cmdq_pkt_write_s()? This
> >> way we would get a clean API for what we want to do.
> >> Do we expect other users of cmdq_pkt_assign()? Otherwise we could keep it
> >> private the this file and don't export it.
> >
> > Considering this case: write 2 register 0xaabb00c0 0xaabb00d0.
> >
> > If we call assign inside write_s api it will be:
> > assign aabb to internal reg 0
> > write reg 0 + 0x00c0
> > assign aabb to internal reg 0
> > write reg 0 + 0x00d0
> >
> >
> > But if we let client decide timing to call assign, it will be like:
> > assign aabb to internal reg 0
> > write reg 0 + 0x00c0
> > write reg 0 + 0x00d0
> >
>
> Ok, thanks for clarification. Is this something you exepect to see in the gce
> consumer driver?
>
yes it is, less command means better performance and save memory, so it
is a good practice for consumer.
> >
> > The first way uses 4 command and second one uses only 3 command.
> > Thus it is better to let client call assign explicitly.
> >
> >>
> >> By the way, why do you postfix the _s, I understand that it reflects the large
> >> DMA access but I wonder why you choose '_s'.
> >>
> >
> > The name of this command is "write_s" which is hardware spec.
> > I'm just following it since it is a common language between gce sw/hw
> > designers.
> >
>
> Ok, I will probably have to look that up every time have a look at the driver,
> but that's OK.
>
ok thanks for your comment
Regards,
Dennis
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dennis
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Dennis
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Matthias
> >>>>
> >>>>> + struct cmdq_instruction inst = {};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + inst.op = CMDQ_CODE_WRITE_S;
> >>>>> + inst.src_t = CMDQ_REG_TYPE;
> >>>>> + inst.sop = high_addr_reg_idx;
> >>>>> + inst.offset = addr_low;
> >>>>> + inst.src_reg = src_reg_idx;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + return cmdq_pkt_append_command(pkt, inst);
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_pkt_write_s);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> int cmdq_pkt_wfe(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u16 event)
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> struct cmdq_instruction inst = { {0} };
> >>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h b/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h
> >>>>> index 121c3bb6d3de..ee67dd3b86f5 100644
> >>>>> --- a/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h
> >>>>> +++ b/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h
> >>>>> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ enum cmdq_code {
> >>>>> CMDQ_CODE_JUMP = 0x10,
> >>>>> CMDQ_CODE_WFE = 0x20,
> >>>>> CMDQ_CODE_EOC = 0x40,
> >>>>> + CMDQ_CODE_WRITE_S = 0x90,
> >>>>> CMDQ_CODE_LOGIC = 0xa0,
> >>>>> };
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h
> >>>>> index 83340211e1d3..e1c5a7549b4f 100644
> >>>>> --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h
> >>>>> +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h
> >>>>> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
> >>>>> #include <linux/timer.h>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> #define CMDQ_NO_TIMEOUT 0xffffffffu
> >>>>> +#define CMDQ_ADDR_HIGH(addr) ((u32)(((addr) >> 16) & GENMASK(31, 0)))
> >>>>> +#define CMDQ_ADDR_LOW(addr) ((u16)(addr) | BIT(1))
> >>>>>
> >>>>> struct cmdq_pkt;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @@ -103,6 +105,23 @@ int cmdq_pkt_write_mask(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u8 subsys,
> >>>>> u16 offset, u32 value, u32 mask);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /**
> >>>>> + * cmdq_pkt_write_s() - append write_s command to the CMDQ packet
> >>>>> + * @pkt: the CMDQ packet
> >>>>> + * @high_addr_reg_idx: internal register ID which contains high address of pa
> >>>>> + * @addr_low: low address of pa
> >>>>> + * @src_reg_idx: the CMDQ internal register ID which cache source value
> >>>>> + *
> >>>>> + * Return: 0 for success; else the error code is returned
> >>>>> + *
> >>>>> + * Support write value to physical address without subsys. Use CMDQ_ADDR_HIGH()
> >>>>> + * to get high address and call cmdq_pkt_assign() to assign value into internal
> >>>>> + * reg. Also use CMDQ_ADDR_LOW() to get low address for addr_low parameter when
> >>>>> + * call to this function.
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> +int cmdq_pkt_write_s(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u16 high_addr_reg_idx,
> >>>>> + u16 addr_low, u16 src_reg_idx);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +/**
> >>>>> * cmdq_pkt_wfe() - append wait for event command to the CMDQ packet
> >>>>> * @pkt: the CMDQ packet
> >>>>> * @event: the desired event type to "wait and CLEAR"
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists