linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200623110331.3f6349e1@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:03:31 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Huy Nguyen <huyn@...lanox.com>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c

between commit:

  94579ac3f6d0 ("xfrm: Fix double ESP trailer insertion in IPsec crypto offload.")

from the net tree and commit:

  272c2330adc9 ("xfrm: bail early on slave pass over skb")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
index 626096bd0d29,b8918fc5248b..000000000000
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
@@@ -106,9 -106,10 +106,10 @@@ struct sk_buff *validate_xmit_xfrm(stru
  	struct sk_buff *skb2, *nskb, *pskb = NULL;
  	netdev_features_t esp_features = features;
  	struct xfrm_offload *xo = xfrm_offload(skb);
+ 	struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
  	struct sec_path *sp;
  
 -	if (!xo)
 +	if (!xo || (xo->flags & XFRM_XMIT))
  		return skb;
  
  	if (!(features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP))
@@@ -129,27 -134,20 +134,22 @@@
  		return skb;
  	}
  
 +	xo->flags |= XFRM_XMIT;
 +
- 	if (skb_is_gso(skb)) {
- 		struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
- 
- 		if (unlikely(x->xso.dev != dev)) {
- 			struct sk_buff *segs;
+ 	if (skb_is_gso(skb) && unlikely(x->xso.dev != dev)) {
+ 		struct sk_buff *segs;
  
- 			/* Packet got rerouted, fixup features and segment it. */
- 			esp_features = esp_features & ~(NETIF_F_HW_ESP
- 							| NETIF_F_GSO_ESP);
+ 		/* Packet got rerouted, fixup features and segment it. */
+ 		esp_features = esp_features & ~(NETIF_F_HW_ESP | NETIF_F_GSO_ESP);
  
- 			segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, esp_features);
- 			if (IS_ERR(segs)) {
- 				kfree_skb(skb);
- 				atomic_long_inc(&dev->tx_dropped);
- 				return NULL;
- 			} else {
- 				consume_skb(skb);
- 				skb = segs;
- 			}
+ 		segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, esp_features);
+ 		if (IS_ERR(segs)) {
+ 			kfree_skb(skb);
+ 			atomic_long_inc(&dev->tx_dropped);
+ 			return NULL;
+ 		} else {
+ 			consume_skb(skb);
+ 			skb = segs;
  		}
  	}
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped