lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200623195427.855825618@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:57:07 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.7 430/477] io_uring: fix io_kiocb.flags modification race in IOPOLL mode

From: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>

[ Upstream commit 65a6543da386838f935d2f03f452c5c0acff2a68 ]

While testing io_uring in arm, we found sometimes io_sq_thread() keeps
polling io requests even though there are not inflight io requests in
block layer. After some investigations, found a possible race about
io_kiocb.flags, see below race codes:
  1) in the end of io_write() or io_read()
    req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
    kfree(iovec);
    return ret;

  2) in io_complete_rw_iopoll()
    if (res != -EAGAIN)
        req->flags |= REQ_F_IOPOLL_COMPLETED;

In IOPOLL mode, io requests still maybe completed by interrupt, then
above codes are not safe, concurrent modifications to req->flags, which
is not protected by lock or is not atomic modifications. I also had
disassemble io_complete_rw_iopoll() in arm:
   req->flags |= REQ_F_IOPOLL_COMPLETED;
   0xffff000008387b18 <+76>:    ldr     w0, [x19,#104]
   0xffff000008387b1c <+80>:    orr     w0, w0, #0x1000
   0xffff000008387b20 <+84>:    str     w0, [x19,#104]

Seems that the "req->flags |= REQ_F_IOPOLL_COMPLETED;" is  load and
modification, two instructions, which obviously is not atomic.

To fix this issue, add a new iopoll_completed in io_kiocb to indicate
whether io request is completed.

Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/io_uring.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -513,7 +513,6 @@ enum {
 	REQ_F_INFLIGHT_BIT,
 	REQ_F_CUR_POS_BIT,
 	REQ_F_NOWAIT_BIT,
-	REQ_F_IOPOLL_COMPLETED_BIT,
 	REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT_BIT,
 	REQ_F_TIMEOUT_BIT,
 	REQ_F_ISREG_BIT,
@@ -556,8 +555,6 @@ enum {
 	REQ_F_CUR_POS		= BIT(REQ_F_CUR_POS_BIT),
 	/* must not punt to workers */
 	REQ_F_NOWAIT		= BIT(REQ_F_NOWAIT_BIT),
-	/* polled IO has completed */
-	REQ_F_IOPOLL_COMPLETED	= BIT(REQ_F_IOPOLL_COMPLETED_BIT),
 	/* has linked timeout */
 	REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT	= BIT(REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT_BIT),
 	/* timeout request */
@@ -618,6 +615,8 @@ struct io_kiocb {
 	int				cflags;
 	bool				needs_fixed_file;
 	u8				opcode;
+	/* polled IO has completed */
+	u8				iopoll_completed;
 
 	u16				buf_index;
 
@@ -1760,7 +1759,7 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_c
 		 * If we find a request that requires polling, break out
 		 * and complete those lists first, if we have entries there.
 		 */
-		if (req->flags & REQ_F_IOPOLL_COMPLETED) {
+		if (READ_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed)) {
 			list_move_tail(&req->list, &done);
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -1941,7 +1940,7 @@ static void io_complete_rw_iopoll(struct
 		req_set_fail_links(req);
 	req->result = res;
 	if (res != -EAGAIN)
-		req->flags |= REQ_F_IOPOLL_COMPLETED;
+		WRITE_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed, 1);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1974,7 +1973,7 @@ static void io_iopoll_req_issued(struct
 	 * For fast devices, IO may have already completed. If it has, add
 	 * it to the front so we find it first.
 	 */
-	if (req->flags & REQ_F_IOPOLL_COMPLETED)
+	if (READ_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed))
 		list_add(&req->list, &ctx->poll_list);
 	else
 		list_add_tail(&req->list, &ctx->poll_list);
@@ -2098,6 +2097,7 @@ static int io_prep_rw(struct io_kiocb *r
 		kiocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_HIPRI;
 		kiocb->ki_complete = io_complete_rw_iopoll;
 		req->result = 0;
+		req->iopoll_completed = 0;
 	} else {
 		if (kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI)
 			return -EINVAL;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ